↓ Skip to main content

What do we know about medication errors made via a CPOE system versus those made via handwritten orders?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
What do we know about medication errors made via a CPOE system versus those made via handwritten orders?
Published in
Critical Care, August 2005
DOI 10.1186/cc3804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ross Koppel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,396
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,749
of 68,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.