↓ Skip to main content

Bedeutung der Surfactant-Proteine B und D in der Differentialdiagnostik der akuten Dyspnoe

Overview of attention for article published in Medizinische Klinik, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 146)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Bedeutung der Surfactant-Proteine B und D in der Differentialdiagnostik der akuten Dyspnoe
Published in
Medizinische Klinik, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00063-010-1100-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claus Lüers, Gerrit Hagenah, Rolf Wachter, Sibylle Kleta, Jens Schaumberg, Sebastian Riedel, Lutz Binder, Klaus Jung, Albrecht Schmidt, Burkert Pieske

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Medizinische Klinik
#16
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,604
of 107,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medizinische Klinik
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.