↓ Skip to main content

A dynamic-sized nonblocking work stealing deque

Overview of attention for article published in Distributed Computing, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
A dynamic-sized nonblocking work stealing deque
Published in
Distributed Computing, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00446-005-0144-5
Authors

Danny Hendler, Yossi Lev, Mark Moir, Nir Shavit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 10%
India 2 6%
Spain 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 24 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Other 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 84%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Distributed Computing
#25
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,406
of 155,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Distributed Computing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.