↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Amnion‐Derived Cellular Cytokine Solution on Healing of Experimental Partial‐Thickness Burns

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Amnion‐Derived Cellular Cytokine Solution on Healing of Experimental Partial‐Thickness Burns
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00268-010-0420-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wyatt G. Payne, Thomas L. Wachtel, Charlotte A. Smith, M. Georgina Uberti, Francis Ko, Martin C. Robson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Engineering 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,518
of 4,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,341
of 166,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.