| Title |
Isolation of the PAX9 cDNA from adult human esophagus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammalian Genome, January 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003359900351 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Peters, G. Schuster, A. Neubüser, T. Richter, H. Höfler, R. Balling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,431,319
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#148
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,624
of 93,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.