| Title |
Factors affecting lipid accumulation by Nannochloropsis oculata in a two-stage cultivation process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-010-9609-4 |
| Authors |
Chia-Hung Su, Liang-Jung Chien, James Gomes, Yu-Sheng Lin, Yuan-Kun Yu, Jhang-Song Liou, Rong-Jhih Syu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 28% |
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 35% |
| Engineering | 21 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 16 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,883,373
of 23,493,900 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#222
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,154
of 100,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,493,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.