| Title |
Epsilon-sarcoglycan is not involved in sporadic Gilles de la Tourette syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
neurogenetics, December 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10048-004-0206-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Friedrich Asmus, Sarah Schoenian, Peter Lichtner, Marita Munz, Petra Mayer, Bertram Muller-Myhsok, Alexander Zimprich, Helmut Remschmidt, Johannes Hebebrand, Oliver Bandmann, Thomas Gasser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#116
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,882
of 139,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.