↓ Skip to main content

Sintering of elemental carbonyl iron and carbonyl nickel powder mixtures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, April 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Sintering of elemental carbonyl iron and carbonyl nickel powder mixtures
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, April 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1018537814204
Authors

TIEN-YIN CHAN, SHUN-TIAN LIN

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 38%
Materials Science 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#1,037
of 4,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,710
of 29,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.