↓ Skip to main content

Fields of Experts

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Vision, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
641 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Fields of Experts
Published in
International Journal of Computer Vision, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11263-008-0197-6
Authors

Stefan Roth, Michael J. Black

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 5%
China 4 1%
Japan 4 1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 317 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 32%
Student > Master 61 17%
Researcher 57 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 4%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 45 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 195 53%
Engineering 73 20%
Mathematics 9 2%
Physics and Astronomy 7 2%
Neuroscience 5 1%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 51 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,594,984
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#398
of 1,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,076
of 172,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.