↓ Skip to main content

A re-evaluation of aragonite versus calcite seas

Overview of attention for article published in Carbonates and Evaporites, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 212)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
A re-evaluation of aragonite versus calcite seas
Published in
Carbonates and Evaporites, September 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf03178476
Authors

Mohammad H. Adabi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,967,425
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Carbonates and Evaporites
#15
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,085
of 60,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbonates and Evaporites
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them