| Title |
Assessing the combined benefits of clay and nanofibrillated cellulose in layered TMP-based sheets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellulose, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10570-009-9290-4 |
| Authors |
K. Mörseburg, G. Chinga-Carrasco |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 22 | 27% |
| Engineering | 13 | 16% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,366,100
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#36
of 931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,058
of 108,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 931 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them