↓ Skip to main content

Customized Plug-in Modules in Metascheduler CSF4 for Life Sciences Applications

Overview of attention for article published in New Generation Computing, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 150)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Customized Plug-in Modules in Metascheduler CSF4 for Life Sciences Applications
Published in
New Generation Computing, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00354-007-0024-6
Authors

Zhaohui Ding, Xiaohui Wei, Yuan Luo, Da ma, Peter W. Arzberger, Wilfred W. Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 9%
Netherlands 1 9%
United States 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Chemistry 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from New Generation Computing
#24
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,541
of 80,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Generation Computing
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them