| Title |
Structure characterization of hydration products generated by alkaline activation of granulated blast furnace slag
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-008-3028-9 |
| Authors |
Yao Jun Zhang, Yong Lin Zhao, Hai Hong Li, De Long Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 37 | 39% |
| Materials Science | 17 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,772
of 93,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.