| Title |
Nonzero-sum differential games
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, March 1969
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00929443 |
| Authors |
A. W. Starr, Y. C. Ho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Ghana | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 42 | 45% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2008.
All research outputs
#7,928,257
of 23,873,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
#40
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#553
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them