| Title |
Self-folding micropatterned polymeric containers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-010-9470-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anum Azam, Kate E. Laflin, Mustapha Jamal, Rohan Fernandes, David H. Gracias |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 32% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 45 | 31% |
| Materials Science | 21 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,699,921
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#240
of 762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,110
of 97,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.