| Title |
Decreasing Rates of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-012-2330-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Max Kates, Hugh J. Lavery, Jonathan Brajtbord, David Samadi, Michael A. Palese |
| Abstract |
The utility of lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continues to be controversial, yet its use by urologists in the United States is unknown. We analyzed the incidence of and trends in LND from a large, nationally representative cancer registry. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 75% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,614
of 6,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,903
of 161,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.