↓ Skip to main content

A golden phoenix arising from the herbal nest — A review and reflection on the study of antimalarial drug Qinghaosu

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers of Chemistry in China, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
A golden phoenix arising from the herbal nest — A review and reflection on the study of antimalarial drug Qinghaosu
Published in
Frontiers of Chemistry in China, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11458-010-0214-5
Authors

Ying Li, Yu-Lin Wu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Chemistry in China
#3
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,570
of 99,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Chemistry in China
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them