↓ Skip to main content

A Locally-Biased form of the DIRECT Algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Global Optimization, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 306)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
247 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Locally-Biased form of the DIRECT Algorithm
Published in
Journal of Global Optimization, September 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1017930332101
Authors

J.M. Gablonsky, C.T. Kelley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Czechia 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 16 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 25%
Computer Science 15 15%
Mathematics 9 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Global Optimization
#42
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,139
of 40,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Global Optimization
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them