↓ Skip to main content

An occupation-based video feedback intervention for improving self-awareness: Protocol and rationale

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An occupation-based video feedback intervention for improving self-awareness: Protocol and rationale
Published in
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, October 2014
DOI 10.1177/0008417414550999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Schmidt, Jennifer Fleming, Tamara Ownsworth, Natasha A. Lannin

Abstract

Impaired self-awareness can limit rehabilitation outcomes for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Video feedback on occupational performance has been found to improve self-awareness after TBI when delivered according to specific principles. The purpose of this article is to describe an occupation-based video feedback intervention found to be effective in a randomized controlled trial to assist with translation into clinical practice. The intervention uses therapist-mediated video feedback on clients' occupational performance, aiming to facilitate self-reflection on performance and improve self-awareness. This paper describes the theoretical background, intervention principles, and protocol of the intervention. Therapists can use video feedback intervention, incorporating the principles in this article, to improve people's intellectual awareness and ability to recognize and correct errors during task performance after TBI without a negative impact on emotional status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#12,915,585
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#207
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,992
of 258,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.