↓ Skip to main content

A relict basal tetrapod from Germany: first evidence of a Triassic chroniosuchian outside Russia

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A relict basal tetrapod from Germany: first evidence of a Triassic chroniosuchian outside Russia
Published in
The Science of Nature, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00114-007-0291-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Witzmann, Rainer R. Schoch, Michael W. Maisch

Abstract

Chroniosuchians are basal tetrapods nesting within the paraphyletic anthracosaurs and were so far only well known from the Permian and Triassic of Russia. In this study, we present evidence for their existence in the upper Middle Triassic of Germany, based on diagnostic osteoderms and vertebrae from the Kupferzell and Vellberg localities in southern Germany. The finds are most similar to Synesuchus, a Middle Triassic bystrowianid chroniosuchian from the Northern Ural Pechora region. They demonstrate that by Middle Triassic time, chroniosuchians were much more widespread than previously thought.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 27%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#817
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,019
of 68,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.