You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-Case Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Management, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00267-009-9391-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie A. Jones, Pascal Perez, Thomas G. Measham, Gail J. Kelly, Patrick d’Aquino, Katherine A. Daniell, Anne Dray, Nils Ferrand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 199 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 58 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 12% |
| Engineering | 17 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 37 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#653
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,719
of 112,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.