↓ Skip to main content

Association of KIBRA and memory

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Letters, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of KIBRA and memory
Published in
Neuroscience Letters, May 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.04.050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy C. Bates, Jackie F. Price, Sarah E. Harris, Riccardo E. Marioni, F. Gerry R. Fowkes, Marlene C. Stewart, Gordon D. Murray, Lawrence J. Whalley, John M. Starr, Ian J. Deary

Abstract

We report on the association of KIBRA with memory in two samples of older individuals assessed on either memory for semantically unrelated word stimuli (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, n=2091), or a measure of semantically related material (the WAIS Logical Memory Test of prose-passage recall, n=542). SNP rs17070145 was associated with delayed recall of semantically unrelated items, but not with immediate recall for these stimuli, nor with either immediate or delayed recall for semantically related material. The pattern of results suggests a role for the T-->C substitution in intron 9 of KIBRA in a component of episodic memory involved in long-term storage but independent of processes shared with immediate recall such as rehearsal involved in acquisition and rehearsal or processes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 54 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Professor 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Letters
#2,300
of 7,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,917
of 103,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Letters
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.