| Title |
Uppaal in a nutshell
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100090050010 |
| Authors |
Kim G. Larsen, Paul Pettersson, Wang Yi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 199 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 37% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 168 | 75% |
| Engineering | 29 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | <1% |
| Design | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#9
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,695
of 235,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them