↓ Skip to main content

Innovation capacity and economic development: China and India

Overview of attention for article published in Economics of Planning, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 104)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Innovation capacity and economic development: China and India
Published in
Economics of Planning, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10644-010-9088-2
Authors

Peilei Fan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 172 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 23%
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 58 32%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38 21%
Social Sciences 26 14%
Engineering 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,621,995
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Economics of Planning
#18
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,084
of 103,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economics of Planning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them