↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of acid-producing sulfidic materials in Virginia highway corridors

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geology, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of acid-producing sulfidic materials in Virginia highway corridors
Published in
Environmental Geology, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00254-004-1027-y
Authors

Zenah W. Orndorff, W. Lee Daniels

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 32%
Researcher 5 26%
Other 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 42%
Environmental Science 7 37%
Computer Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2008.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#67
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,884
of 58,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.