↓ Skip to main content

Generating an adaptive multiresolution image analysis with compact cupolets

Overview of attention for article published in Nonlinear Dynamics, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Generating an adaptive multiresolution image analysis with compact cupolets
Published in
Nonlinear Dynamics, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11071-007-9257-7
Authors

Kourosh Zarringhalam, Kevin M. Short

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 58%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 5 42%
Computer Science 3 25%
Engineering 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2008.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Nonlinear Dynamics
#80
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,457
of 72,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nonlinear Dynamics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them