↓ Skip to main content

Software architecture for hard real-time applications: Cyclic executives vs. fixed priority executives

Overview of attention for article published in Real-Time Systems, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Software architecture for hard real-time applications: Cyclic executives vs. fixed priority executives
Published in
Real-Time Systems, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00365463
Authors

C. Douglass Locke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 30%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 28 70%
Engineering 6 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2012.
All research outputs
#3,317,125
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Real-Time Systems
#1
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,005
of 18,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Real-Time Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them