↓ Skip to main content

From genetics to epigenetics: the tale of Polycomb group and trithorax group genes

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosome Research, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
From genetics to epigenetics: the tale of Polycomb group and trithorax group genes
Published in
Chromosome Research, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10577-006-1069-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Grimaud, Nicolas Nègre, Giacomo Cavalli

Abstract

The Polycomb gene was discovered 60 years ago as a mutation inducing a particular homeotic phenotype. Subsequent work showed that Polycomb is a general repressor of homeotic genes. Other genes with similar function were identified and named Polycomb group (PcG) genes, while trithorax group (trxG) genes were shown to counteract PcG-mediated repression of homeotic genes. We now know that PcG and trxG proteins are conserved factors that regulate hundreds of different genomic loci. A sophisticated pathway is responsible for recruitment of these proteins at regulatory regions that were named PcG and trxG response elements (PRE and TRE). Once recruited to their targets, multimeric PcG and trxG protein complexes regulate transcription by modulating chromatin structure, in particular via deposition of specific post-translational histone modification marks and control of chromatin accessibility, as well as regulation of the three-dimensional nuclear organization of PRE and TRE. Here, we recapitulate the history of PcG and trxG gene discovery, we review the current evidence on their molecular function and, based on this evidence, we propose a revised classification of genes involved in PcG and trxG regulatory pathways.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 189 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 30%
Researcher 48 23%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 18 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Chromosome Research
#145
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,744
of 64,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosome Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.