↓ Skip to main content

The hypnozoite concept, with particular reference to malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 3,782)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
The hypnozoite concept, with particular reference to malaria
Published in
Parasitology Research, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00436-010-2072-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miles B. Markus

Abstract

In 1978, the nature of the hypnozoite was discussed in an article that appeared in a relatively obscure journal, which is also where the term was adopted for Plasmodium (a little-known fact). As a result, that commentary on the use of the word "hypnozoite" has been almost completely overlooked. Although the publication is now more than three decades old, the analysis remains valid today. It is explained in the present paper that like "merozoite" and "sporozoite", the name "hypnozoite" is applicable not only to a latent stage in the life cycle of Plasmodium but to some apparently dormant forms of other kinds of apicomplexan parasites as well. Merozoites of different genera of parasitic protozoa are not necessarily the same biologically and/or otherwise. Similarly, although the hypnozoite concept relates primarily to pre-merozoite stages, some atypical post-divisional apicomplexan forms might also be hypnozoites. Examples are likewise given of latent organisms that, in contrast, are clearly not hypnozoites, such as dormant merozoites in malaria infections. Lastly, the plasmodial hypnozoite is placed in context in relation to the relatively unfamiliar (nomenclaturally) malarial bradysporozoite, chronozoite, dormozoite, merophore, merosome and x body. This paper is based on a presentation by the author, as a Life Member of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, to its 59th Annual Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 3-7 November 2010.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Lithuania 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Chemistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#807,582
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#16
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,352
of 99,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.