↓ Skip to main content

The orbitofrontal cortex: Neuronal activity in the behaving monkey

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, January 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
752 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The orbitofrontal cortex: Neuronal activity in the behaving monkey
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, January 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00235545
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. J. Thorpe, E. T. Rolls, S. Maddison

Abstract

Single unit recording of neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex of the alert rhesus monkey was used to investigate responses to sensory stimulation. 32.4% of the neurons had visual responses that had typical latencies of 100-200 ms, and 9.4% responded to gustatory inputs. Most neurons were selective, in that they responded consistently to some stimuli such as foods or aversive objects, but not to others. In a number of cases the neurons responded selectively to particular foods or aversive stimuli. However, this high selectivity could not be explained by simple sensory features of the stimulus, since the responses of some neurons could be readily reversed if the meaning of the stimulus (i.e. whether it was food or aversive) was changed, even though its physical appearance remained identical. Further, some bimodal neurons received convergent visual and gustatory inputs, with matching selectivity for the same stimulus in both modalities, again suggesting that an explanation in terms of simple sensory features is inadequate. Neurons were also studied during the performance of tasks known to be disrupted by orbitofrontal lesions, including a go/no go visual discrimination task and its reversal. 8.6% of neurons had differential responses to the two discriminative stimuli in the task, one of which indicated that reward was available and the other saline. Reversing the meaning of the two stimuli showed that whereas some differential units were closely linked to the sensory features of the stimuli, and some to their behavioural significance, others were conditional, in that they would only respond if a particular stimulus was present, and if it was the one being currently rewarded. Other neurons had activity related to the outcome of the animal's response, with some indicating that reinforcement had been received and others, that an error had been made and that a reversal was required. Thus, neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex possess highly coded information about which stimuli are present, as well as information about the consequences of the animal's own responses. It is suggested that together they may constitute a neuronal mechanism for determining whether particular visual stimuli continue to be associated with reinforcement, as well as providing for the modification of the animal's behavioural responses to such stimuli when those responses are no longer appropriate.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Germany 4 1%
Switzerland 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 264 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 21%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Master 25 9%
Professor 23 8%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 25%
Neuroscience 65 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 41 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#900
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,904
of 33,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them