| Title |
The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy Sciences, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11077-008-9071-1 |
| Authors |
Måns Nilsson, Andrew Jordan, John Turnpenny, Julia Hertin, Björn Nykvist, Duncan Russel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 54% |
| Guinea | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 30% |
| Researcher | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 58 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 7% |
| Engineering | 11 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,294,754
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#80
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,868
of 186,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them