↓ Skip to main content

Immunity to killer toxin K1 is connected with the golgi-to-vacuole protein degradation pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Microbiologica, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Immunity to killer toxin K1 is connected with the golgi-to-vacuole protein degradation pathway
Published in
Folia Microbiologica, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/bf02932122
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Vališ, T. Mašek, D. Novotná, M. Pospišek, B. Janderová

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2009.
All research outputs
#8,510,224
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#141
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,039
of 81,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them