↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen adsorption on nanoporous carbon adsorbents prepared from furaldehyde by thermochemical synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Colloid Journal, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogen adsorption on nanoporous carbon adsorbents prepared from furaldehyde by thermochemical synthesis
Published in
Colloid Journal, June 2008
DOI 10.1134/s1061933x08030162
Authors

A. A. Fomkin, V. A. Sinitsyn, V. V. Gur’yanov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Materials Science 1 20%
Chemistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Colloid Journal
#17
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,765
of 82,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Colloid Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.