↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation and optimization of hepatocyte culture media factors by design of experiments (DoE) methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Cell Science, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,026)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation and optimization of hepatocyte culture media factors by design of experiments (DoE) methodology
Published in
Methods in Cell Science, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10616-008-9168-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Dong, Carl-Fredrik Mandenius, Marc Lübberstedt, Thomas Urbaniak, Andreas K. N. Nüssler, Daniel Knobeloch, Jörg C. Gerlach, Katrin Zeilinger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 86 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Engineering 9 10%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,415,880
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Cell Science
#50
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,915
of 102,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Cell Science
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.