↓ Skip to main content

Posterior Cortical Atrophy: Review of the Recent Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Posterior Cortical Atrophy: Review of the Recent Literature
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11910-013-0406-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

François-Xavier Borruat

Abstract

Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is a group of neurodegenerative dementing disorders characterized by initial predominant visual complaints followed by progressive decline in cognitive functions. The visuospatial and visuoperceptual defects arise from the dysfunction of, respectively, the dorsal (occipito-parietal) and the ventral (occipito-temporal) streams. Clinical symptoms, results of neuropsychological examination, and findings of posterior cerebral atrophy and/or posterior hypoperfusion/hypometabolism contribute to the diagnosis. However, owing to the insidious onset of PCA and the non-specificity of initial symptoms, the diagnosis is often delayed. Specific etiologies include Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, subcortical gliosis, corticobasal degeneration, and prion-associated diseases. Alzheimer's disease accounts for at least 80 % of PCA cases. Recent research has concentrated on better defining the clinical presentation of PCA, improving neuroimaging analysis, testing new neuroimaging techniques, and developing biological measurements. Selected recent papers on PCA are reviewed in this article.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Neuroscience 9 16%
Psychology 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Linguistics 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#391
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,995
of 211,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.