↓ Skip to main content

Improved Lung Delivery from a Passive Dry Powder Inhaler Using an Engineered PulmoSphere® Powder

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Improved Lung Delivery from a Passive Dry Powder Inhaler Using an Engineered PulmoSphere® Powder
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, May 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1015322616613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarma P. Duddu, Steven A. Sisk, Yulia H. Walter, Thomas E. Tarara, Kevin R. Trimble, Andrew R. Clark, Michael A. Eldon, Rebecca C. Elton, Matthew Pickford, Peter H. Hirst, Stephen P. Newman, Jeffry G. Weers

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 35%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Chemistry 10 13%
Engineering 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#270
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,255
of 127,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.