| Title |
Image gallery: A tool for rapid endobronchial lesion detection and display using virtual bronchoscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, August 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03168259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald M. Summers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 43% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#4,761,657
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#171
of 1,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,379
of 32,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,064 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them