↓ Skip to main content

Simple Efficient Load-Balancing Algorithms for Peer-to-Peer Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Theory of Computing Systems, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 132)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Simple Efficient Load-Balancing Algorithms for Peer-to-Peer Systems
Published in
Theory of Computing Systems, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00224-006-1246-6
Authors

David R. Karger, Matthias Ruhl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 3%
Researcher 2 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 2%
Student > Bachelor 1 <1%
Professor 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 117 91%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Engineering 1 <1%
Unknown 116 91%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Theory of Computing Systems
#26
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,263
of 66,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory of Computing Systems
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.