↓ Skip to main content

Vapor-Phase Growth of Bulk Crystals of Cadmium Telluride and Cadmium Zinc Telluride on Gallium Arsenide Seeds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Electronic Materials, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Vapor-Phase Growth of Bulk Crystals of Cadmium Telluride and Cadmium Zinc Telluride on Gallium Arsenide Seeds
Published in
Journal of Electronic Materials, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11664-008-0442-3
Authors

J.T. Mullins, B.J. Cantwell, A. Basu, Q. Jiang, A. Choubey, A.W. Brinkman, B.K. Tanner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 25%
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electronic Materials
#238
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,685
of 82,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electronic Materials
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them