↓ Skip to main content

Effect of functionalized micropatterned PLGA on guided neurite growth

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Biomaterialia, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of functionalized micropatterned PLGA on guided neurite growth
Published in
Acta Biomaterialia, September 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Yao, Shenguo Wang, Wenjin Cui, Richard Sherlock, Claire O’Connell, Gopinath Damodaran, Adrienne Gorman, Anthony Windebank, Abhay Pandit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 31%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Materials Science 16 12%
Chemistry 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Biomaterialia
#1,157
of 4,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,852
of 98,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Biomaterialia
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.