| Title |
Preparation and characterization of cerium oxide templated from activated carbon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-006-0829-6 |
| Authors |
Mark Crocker, Uschi M. Graham, Rolando Gonzalez, Gary Jacobs, Erin Morris, Aurora M. Rubel, Rodney Andrews |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 8 | 32% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 20% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2013.
All research outputs
#4,761,657
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#295
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,034
of 160,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.