↓ Skip to main content

Translating tissue-engineered tracheal replacement from bench to bedside

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Translating tissue-engineered tracheal replacement from bench to bedside
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00018-010-0499-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madhuri Kalathur, Silvia Baiguera, Paolo Macchiarini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 57 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 27%
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Engineering 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,655
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,888
of 96,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.