| Title |
Mesoporous amorphous MnO2 as electrode material for supercapacitor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10008-006-0246-4 |
| Authors |
Mao-Wen Xu, Dan-Dan Zhao, Shu-Juan Bao, Hu-Lin Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 22 | 22% |
| Materials Science | 22 | 22% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 13% |
| Engineering | 12 | 12% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,761,657
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry
#28
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,622
of 159,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them