| Title |
Investigating the rp-process with the Canadian Penning trap mass spectrometer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal A, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-172-3 |
| Authors |
J. A. Clark, R. C. Barber, B. Blank, C. Boudreau, F. Buchinger, J. E. Crawford, J. P. Greene, S. Gulick, J. C. Hardy, A. A. Hecht, A. Heinz, J. K. P. Lee, A. F. Levand, B. F. Lundgren, R. B. Moore, G. Savard, N. D. Scielzo, D. Seweryniak, K. S. Sharma, G. D. Sprouse, W. Trimble, J. Vaz, J. C. Wang, Y. Wang, B. J. Zabransky, Z. Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 50% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2008.
All research outputs
#7,863,403
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal A
#257
of 1,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,909
of 58,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal A
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them