| Title |
Hydrophobicity drives the cellular uptake of short cationic peptide ligands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Biophysics Journal, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00249-011-0685-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anju Gupta, Deendayal Mandal, Yousef Ahmadibeni, Keykavous Parang, Geoffrey Bothun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 30% |
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 30% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2013.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from European Biophysics Journal
#103
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,525
of 108,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Biophysics Journal
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.