You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficient imaging of amyloid deposits in Drosophila models of human amyloidoses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Protocols, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nprot.2010.41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ina Berg, K Peter R Nilsson, Stefan Thor, Per Hammarström |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 27% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,761,657
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#1,495
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,217
of 96,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.