↓ Skip to main content

High-Throughput Screening Techniques for Biomass Conversion

Overview of attention for article published in BioEnergy Research, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
High-Throughput Screening Techniques for Biomass Conversion
Published in
BioEnergy Research, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12155-009-9051-0
Authors

Stephen R. Decker, Roman Brunecky, Melvin P. Tucker, Michael E. Himmel, Michael J. Selig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 3%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Finland 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 126 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 22%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 50%
Chemistry 23 16%
Engineering 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from BioEnergy Research
#78
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,904
of 96,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEnergy Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them