| Title |
An Efficient and Secure Dynamic ID-based Authentication Scheme for Telecare Medical Information Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10916-012-9862-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hung-Ming Chen, Jung-Wen Lo, Chang-Kuo Yeh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 20 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,761,657
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#157
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,094
of 167,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them