↓ Skip to main content

Matrix Cubic Splines for Progressive 3D Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Matrix Cubic Splines for Progressive 3D Imaging
Published in
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, July 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020774608752
Authors

E. Defez, J. Villanueva-Oller, R.J. Villanueva, A. Law

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 40%
Mathematics 1 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#69
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,875
of 47,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them