↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale rigid body simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Multibody System Dynamics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Large-scale rigid body simulations
Published in
Multibody System Dynamics, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11044-010-9212-0
Authors

Klaus Iglberger, Ulrich Rüde

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
France 1 4%
Norway 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Student > Master 5 18%
Researcher 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 57%
Computer Science 3 11%
Mathematics 2 7%
Materials Science 2 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Multibody System Dynamics
#15
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,355
of 96,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multibody System Dynamics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them